Fake art detection & recognition

    AI-assisted analysis of visual features, materials, provenance data, stylistic patterns, and historical context, helping you recognize warning signals before formal expert appraisal.

    Process

    How fake detection works

    Five layers of analysis working together to surface signals that warrant attention.

    Art authentication laboratory with a portrait painting under a digital microscope, alongside brushstroke analysis software and pigment composition charts
    01

    Visual analysis

    Examining brushwork, glazing patterns, printing techniques, aging signals, symmetry, and tooling marks to identify inconsistencies invisible to the untrained eye.

    02

    Material & technique checks

    Cross-referencing visible materials, construction methods, and surface characteristics against what's expected for the claimed period and origin.

    03

    Style & period comparison

    Comparing stylistic elements against known references: proportions, color palettes, decorative motifs, and manufacturing patterns typical of specific eras.

    04

    Provenance logic checks

    Evaluating timeline plausibility, ownership gaps, geographic mismatches, and documentation consistency to flag improbable provenance narratives. Explore our dedicated provenance gap detection tool.

    05

    Pattern recognition

    Matching against known reproduction traits, common forgery signatures, and recurring patterns observed across documented fakes and copies.

    Capabilities

    What we analyze, and what we can't

    Clarity about our strengths is just as important as honesty about our limits.

    Signals we analyze

    • Common reproduction signals and copy indicators
    • Style-period mismatches and anachronistic elements
    • Modern materials appearing in historical objects
    • Inconsistent wear patterns or artificial aging
    • Overused or suspicious marks, signatures, and stamps
    • Machine-made characteristics in supposedly handmade objects
    • Printing or manufacturing patterns inconsistent with claimed origin

    Important limitations

    • -Not a replacement for physical laboratory testing
    • -Not a legal authentication certificate or expert opinion
    • -Cannot detect sophisticated forgeries requiring scientific analysis
    • -Results are probabilistic signals, not definitive verdicts
    • -Designed as an early warning and research accelerator
    How we communicate results

    Signals, not verdicts

    Results are expressed as confidence ranges and signal strength, never as yes/no judgments.

    Authenticity signals

    Positive indicators that align with genuine characteristics, such as consistent aging, period-appropriate materials, and expected stylistic features.

    Risk indicators

    Warning signals that suggest further investigation, including unusual patterns, material inconsistencies, stylistic anomalies, or provenance gaps.

    Reproduction likelihood

    A confidence range indicating how closely the object matches known reproduction patterns, expressed as probability, never as a binary judgment.

    Built for

    Who this is for

    Anyone who needs a second set of trained eyes before making decisions about art and collectibles.

    Private collectors

    Verify pieces before purchasing. Add a layer of due diligence to every acquisition decision.

    Auction buyers

    Research lots before bidding. Identify potential red flags that deserve expert follow-up.

    Dealers & galleries

    Screen inventory efficiently. Build client confidence with documented analysis records.

    Inheritors & estate researchers

    Understand what you've received. Separate genuine heirlooms from later copies or attributions.

    Curious owners

    Finally learn whether that attic find, flea market purchase, or family mystery is what you think it is.

    Our approach

    Ethical & transparent AI

    We believe honest ambiguity is more valuable than false certainty.

    Reducing false certainty

    We never declare objects fake or real. Every result communicates uncertainty, because honest ambiguity is more useful than false confidence.

    Explainable results

    Every flag comes with reasoning. You can see exactly which signals contributed to the assessment, avoiding black-box verdicts.

    Supporting human expertise

    Our tool is designed to complement, not replace, professional appraisers, conservators, and historians. We accelerate research, not bypass it.

    Transparent limitations

    We clearly communicate what our analysis can and cannot do. Trust is built through honesty about boundaries.

    Seamlessly integrated

    Part of every scan

    Fake detection works naturally within the Curiosa workflow you already know.

    Object scanning

    Authenticity signals are generated automatically during every scan, so no extra steps are required.

    Collection cataloging

    Risk indicators are stored alongside your item records for ongoing reference and research.

    Provenance building

    Detection insights feed into provenance documentation, strengthening ownership narratives.

    Valuation context

    Authenticity assessment directly informs value estimates, as genuine pieces command different markets.

    Learn more

    Period plausibility analysis

    Material and technique checks feed directly into historical alignment assessments, verifying whether objects fit their claimed era.

    Learn more

    City curiosity guide

    Scan monuments, facades, and architectural details while exploring cities. Authenticity signals apply to urban objects too.

    Learn more

    Long-term research

    Track how assessments evolve as new reference data becomes available and your knowledge grows.

    A second set of eyes

    Trained on patterns, history, and context. Scan your object. Ask better questions.