Skip to main content
Curiosa
Sign InTry a scan

Chinese Pale Green-Glazed Incised 'Dragon' Bowl, Tongzhi Mark

Chinese porcelain bowl with pale green glaze and incised dragon motif, base showing six-character Tongzhi reign mark - view 1
1/2

Estimated value

$1,500 - $3,500

Rarity

Scarce(6/10)

Era

1861-1875 (Tongzhi Period, Qing Dynasty)

Origin

🇨🇳 China

Authenticity

Moderate(60%)
3

KILN TO COLLECTION: CHINESE PALE GREEN-GLAZED INCISED 'DRAGON' BOWL, TONGZHI MARK

This is a Chinese porcelain bowl featuring a pale green, celadon-type monochrome glaze. The exterior is finely incised with an ‘an-hua’ (secret or hidden decoration) motif of two striding five-clawed dragons in pursuit of flaming pearls amidst stylized ruyi clouds, positioned beneath a gently everted rim. A classic key-fret border encircles the slightly tapered foot. The base is glazed white and bears a six-character underglaze blue reign mark in regular script (kaishu) reading 'Da Qing Tongzhi Nian Zhi', arranged in two vertical columns.

CLAY ACROSS CULTURES

Where This Object Echoes

Ming Dynasty China1403-1435

The aesthetic of incised monochrome wares directly parallels the early 15th-century imperial porcelains of the Yongle and Xuande reigns.

Ritual & Ceremonial Use

  • •Imperial dining and court ceremonies where monochrome wares were assigned based on strict hierarchical ranks.

Meaning Through Time

Late Qing to Republic

Shifted from strictly restricted imperial court items to status symbols collected by wealthy merchants and Western export markets.

FROM KILN TO COLLECTOR

The Tongzhi reign (1861-1875) represented a brief period of 'restoration' during the declining years of the Qing Dynasty. Following the devastation of the Taiping Rebellion, the imperial kilns at Jingdezhen were rebuilt in 1866. Production during this era frequently sought to emulate the ...
The Tongzhi reign (1861-1875) represented a brief period of 'restoration' during the declining years of the Qing Dynasty. Following the devastation of the Taiping Rebellion, the imperial kilns at Jingdezhen were rebuilt in 1866. Production during this era frequently sought to emulate the monumental achievements of the earlier Kangxi, Yongzheng, and Qianlong periods, as well as classic Ming Dynasty forms. The use of 'an-hua' incised decoration under a pale monochrome glaze is a direct homage to early Ming dynasty (15th century) imperial wares, which likely explains why earlier attributions or misidentifications often occur with these revival pieces.

KILN-SIDE SECRETS

1

The 'an-hua' technique requires the artisan to incise the porcelain body while it is leather-hard, before applying the glaze, creating a subtle design that is often best viewed when held to the light.

2

The five-clawed dragon was strictly reserved for the Emperor, Empress, and highest-ranking members of the imperial family; lower ranks were legally restricted to four or three-clawed variants.

HOW SCARCE IS IT?

Scarce80-90%
CommonLegendary

Genuinely harder to find. Perhaps only dozens come to market annually. Collectors actively watch for these pieces.

Typical Characteristics

  • Dozens per year at market
  • Documented provenance valued
  • Active collector pursuit

Confidence Factors

  • Late Qing imperial wares (Tongzhi/Guangxu) are heavily faked and reproduced in modern Jingdezhen kilns.
  • The user's stated date of '1500' drastically conflicts with the physical Tongzhi (1861-1875) mark, indicating potential provenance unreliability.
  • Positive authentication of underglaze blue cobalt requires close microscopic inspection to confirm genuine depth and 'heaping and piling' effects absent in modern chemical cobalt.
How does authenticity detection work?

CERAMICIST'S ASSESSMENT

Asian Art Specialist

East Asian Art Expert

I can positively identify the intended period and style of this piece based on clear mark and decoration. However, the prolific forging of late Qing wares and the user's highly conflicting date attribution preclude a definitive 'High' certainty without physical examination.

KEY EVIDENCE

  • 1Six-character regular script (kaishu) underglaze blue mark naming the Tongzhi Emperor.
  • 2An-hua (secret decoration) incised dragon motif under a pale green/celadon glaze.
  • 3Key-fret bordered foot, a common anchoring motif on late Qing imperial bowls.
  • 4Evenly fired biscuit footrim displaying characteristics of 19th-century Jingdezhen paste.

UNCERTAINTIES

  • •Severe chronological mismatch between the user's provided context (1500) and the physical reign mark (1860s).
  • •The calligraphy of the mark, while orderly, feels slightly stiff, warranting hands-on verification to rule out a high-quality mid-20th century Republic copy.

WHAT WOULD IMPROVE CERTAINTY

  • →Examine the glaze under a 10x or 30x jeweler's loupe to evaluate the structure of the glaze bubbles (looking for natural degradation).
  • →Inspect the underglaze blue mark under magnification to check for modern printed outlines or overly uniform synthetic cobalt.
  • →Check under UV light for any concealed structural repairs to the rim or body.

CONDITION & GRADE

Condition

Visually intact with no immediate evidence of major restoration. The glaze appears glossy and consistent. There is minor shelf wear to the unglazed footrim, which is standard and expected for a piece of this period.

Surface

The piece exhibits a smooth, vitreous monochrome glaze pooling slightly deeper green within the incised channels of the dragon motif. The exposed footrim is unglazed, showing a fine-grained, well-refined white porcelain paste with minor iron spotting at the firing margin.

Weight & feel

Substantial yet finely potted, with weight concentrated in the foot ring—a hallmark of late Qing kiln firing practices.

CERAMICS MARKET VALUE

$1,500 - $3,500

Updated: May 5, 2026

Who buys this

Collectors of late Qing imperial ceramics, investors in Chinese art, and interior designers seeking authentic Chinese monochromes.

What increases value

  • •Authenticity of the Tongzhi mark and period matching.
  • •Clarity and crispness of the incised 'an-hua' dragon motif under the glaze.
  • •Absence of common rim fritting or hairline cracks.

What lowers value

  • •If determined to be a later Republic period (1912-1949) copy, value drops significantly by 70-80%.
  • •Microscopic rim chips or restored hairlines invisible in flat photography.

What makes top-tier examples

  • •Deep, rich pooling of the glaze in the incised areas creating strong visual contrast.
  • •Impeccable, highly structured imperial calligraphy in the base mark.
  • •Documented provenance dating prior to 20th-century market flooding.

Grade & condition

In porcelain, value hinges entirely on structural perfection (no chips, cracks, repairs) and the firing success of the glaze (lack of kiln grit, spotting, or glaze shrinking).

Rarity & demand

ScarceModerate demandModerate liquidity
Browse similar ceramics objects

For informational purposes only, not a formal appraisal.

CONTEXT ANALYSIS

How your provided context compares with Curiosa.com scanner findings.

What Aligned

  • User believes the origin is China, which aligns flawlessly with the stylistic profile, manufacturing techniques, and reign mark.
  • User condition assessment of 'minor wear' is visually consistent with the clean state of the bowl and footrim.

What Conflicted

  • User asserts the time period is '1500' (Ming Dynasty), but the six-character underglaze blue mark on the base explicitly reads 'Da Qing Tongzhi Nian Zhi', placing its creation in the Late Qing Dynasty (1861-1875).

FROM THE CABINET OF

EW

ewe
Wonderseeker•1 item

COMMENTS

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Sign in to leave a comment

ABOUT CERAMICS & POTTERY

Pottery, porcelain, stoneware, earthenware, and kiln-fired objects.

Ceramics & Pottery value and rarity guide

SHARE THIS CURIOSITY

Have your own curiosities to discover?

Scan Your Curiosity